Sunday, November 25, 2007

Two weeks? In f*cking Bruges? In a room like this, with you?


http://www.alliancefilms.com/inbruges/trailer.html

Not necessarily the best trailer in the world (it's decent), but check it out. It's for the upcoming In Bruges, written and directed by Martin McDonagh, and I'm not gonna get mushy, but this is something I am going to plug, because Martin McDonagh is a fucking genius.

You know when you're a kid, and you have that fantasy that some day you'll grow up and set all these records, be the youngest to do this and that, be the best at this, win awards, be acclaimed whatever you do? Well, if those fantasies had come true, you'd be Martin McDonagh.

The man was the first man to have 4 plays running in the West End in the same time since a man called William Shakespeare -- at the age of 27. Starting with his first play, he was nominated and won a slew of Obies, Oliviers Awards, Tony Awards, Drama Desk Awards, Evening Standard Awards, Writers Guild Awards, et al. He created a movement. His first short film won him an Academy Award. His first feature-film is opening the Sundance Film Festival.

And how did he pay for himself as he started out? Unemployment benefits, the fucker!

You don't have to check out the trailer. You don't have to like the trailer. But keep an eye out for the film when it comes out, and if it sounds like something you might like, give it a go -- the man's sure to at least give you something to talk about afterwards.

Cheers,

Ten Cents

Saturday, November 24, 2007

The Getaway Car


Best recent TV show. Seriously -- I can see why it got canceled -- but if you've got any interest in Saturday Night Live, sketch comedy in general, producing film or television, and/or like The West Wing and rat-tat-tat dialogue, then Studio 60 On The Sunset Strip is for you. And, on a sidenote, Danny Tripp is God. I'm starting a cult and calling us the Trippers. Who's in? Let's Tripp together.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I'm developing a script at the moment (if you know what it's about, ssshhhhhh). It's an adaptation of a recently released bestseller, it's the first option I ever got in my life, and I'm fairly excited about it. And the reason I'm bringing it up is something that has to do with producing: how hard it is to find writers.

If you're just starting out in the film business, and you're a director or producer who can't especially write, then your first challenge is going to be finding someone who can. To be honest, decent actors are relatively easy to find -- not great ones, but decent ones; and so are ideas. Writers, who can make that idea into a piece that has something worth filming on every page, though, are a very, very rare thing. If you've ever been to a film festival, you'll agree with me that one thing short films and low-budget independent films have in common is great lighting, great camerawork, decent acting, good editing, and HORRENDOUS writing. The dialogue will be all right, albeit showy, the structure will be shoddy and essentially rely on a last-minute twist, and any theme or subtlety is usually missing in action. I used to think this is because most people don't work on their scripts enough, and I now think I used to be mistaken. It's because scriptwriting is a bloody hard, unnatural thing to do.

I like to think of myself as a competent semi-pro screenwriter. In the sense that if I have a solid, plot-able idea, I can write that out into a script that's fairly clever, fairly entertaining, and fairly commonplace. It'll take me lots of hard work, but it'll have a theme, two- or three-dimensional characters (also whether they're interesting or not I couldn't vouch for), and a somewhat compelling, forward-moving three-act(ish) structure; dialogue that doesn't rape your ear; and maybe even one or two good scenes. The problem is, it'll also be about as exciting, inspired and risky as your average chair. And I think people can learn to get to that level of writing -- get a good idea, hack it out to where it clunks along in a decent fashion -- and then use those skills to shoot a decent short film, go to a festival, network, find better writers, and move up the Ladder To Nowhere together.

But inspired writing -- and this is what I need for this, inspired, tone-perfect, brings-tears-to-your-eyes-as-you-smile writing -- is rarer than diamond. It's not a very new thing to do, and probably not something you give a pole-dancing crap about, but I've been wrestling with this adaptation for a couple of weeks now, and that's what on my mind on the moment, so I thought I'd share.

And as you might be wondering: Yes, I do support the Writers' Strike. It's a shame there is a strike, but if there's a right side and a wrong side, the writers are definitely in the right.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

It's funny (and by funny, I mean unbearably sad) how America used to mean apple pie, Brett Favre, Bruce Springsteen, Clint Eastwood, Walter Cronkite, fulfilling your potential, entrepreneurship, hard work, family values, hot dogs, the 4th of July, and men on the moon; and now it means Burger King, Michael Vick, Paris Hilton, Adam Sandler, Fox News, fear, Enron, legalized torture, distrust, and the impunity of the powerful.

Don't me wrong -- I never thought America used to be Heaven and is now Hell (I mean, Jefferson of the many lovers were as hypocritical as they came; the Founding Fathers knew smear campaigns as well as anyone before or since; and the 50s had their share of crappy blonde "singers"). But their used to be respect for the idea of America. It was cultivated. People who believed in it were welcomed, and people who made it happen were celebrated. I can't help but be worried by the fact that America won the Civil War by being the side that fought for their rights rather than their privileges; then won the Cold War by being the side that said "we'll fight if you pick a fight"; and now is losing the war on terror by being the side that attacks third-party countries and says, "torture? sure. slap a different name on it, lie about it, and we can do it". I can't help but worry that they're fighting a moral struggle by taking the same moral low road as their enemies do.

If you had asked people in the 30s, 40s, 50s, 60s, what the word America meant to them... I'd never dare predict what their answers would have been, but I imagine they would've been very different from what people would think of first now. Not in a good way, either.

I suppose it's a cyclical thing, that the superpower that rose as a beacon of progress falls as a litter of fat cats, and that if it happened to Athens, Rome and the L.A. Lakers, it's only logical that it could happen to America. To someone like me, though, who grew up on the idea and values of Americanism (despite not being even remotely American), it's like waking up one morning and realizing that Kermit the Frog is actually a wife-beating child molester. Or is that piggy-beating child molester?

In any case, it's not a warm feeling.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Things have, otherwise, been going relatively well. I've been meeting writers (some of them potentially very good, shame on my earlier self for being so negative), optioned the project, and even though I can't announce exactly who just yet (but will soon), I have just signed a fairly well-known artist to help us finish that long-overdue short film I'm hoping to get out there in the somewhat near future. In my first year out of film school, I worked with Robert DeNiro, Indiana Jones, Elizabeth, a Stephen King story, and Natalie Portman; and hustled a (very good) short film into film festivals.

Looking back, it's been good. The one problem so far has been getting paid to an extent where I can do all these things comfortably, without counting pennies in the evenings to make sure I'm not going to eat canned soup all weekend, and if any of you hear me talking about needing a win, that's what I'm referring to. One of those Paying Jobs. I'm onto a few leads, but the legend is true: they're a hard thing to come by. Not any paying jobs, not something to pay the rent and food, but something that's IN the film business, advances your career and learning, and can pay for optioning stuff, buying your writing books, maintaining your software, traveling to a couple film festivals, registering copyrights, and all the while have enough time to keep working on your stuff.

You might say I'm not finding one of those jobs because they can't be had. But, hey -- I'm not gonna get anywhere by having what can be had, am I? That would be too easy.

Cheers,

TenCents

PS: Check out I'm Not There and Gone Baby Gone if you can. Great films -- and both, to me, epitomize, in very different ways, what independent is all about. Risky, unique, artfully made, entertaining, challenging and emotionally and morally complex. If I get to help make one of those, two of those, in my lifetime, I'll die a happy producer.

PPS: And to finish, and in case you'd like me to explain the title of the post, a David Mamet quote about producers...

"The artist is, in effect, a sort of gangster. He hitches up his trousers and goes into the guarded bank of the unconscious in an attempt to steal the gold of inspiration. The producer is like the getaway driver who sells the getaway car and waits outside the bank grinning about what a great deal he's made." - David Mamet, Bambi vs. Godzilla

You gotta love film people.

Sunday, October 21, 2007

London Film Festival (Week 1)

In The Shadow Of The Moon

In The Shadow Of The Moon is a British documentary, directed by TV veteran David Sington, and telling the story of the only people to ever reach the moon -- American Apollo astronauts. Using tons of unseen footage, and new interview with the surviving Apollo crew members, the movie is an inspiring experience, starting with the beginnings of the space race, and, using Apollo 11 as a centerpiece, tells the astronauts' stories -- how they got to the moon and back, what it was like, and what they took away from it.

The film is an uplifting experience, and a lot of the space footage is awe-inspiring. The most enlightening part is getting to know the astronauts involved (you get to hear everyone's first hand recollections, with the sole exception of Neil Armstrong, who is famous for keeping to himself), who are all soft-spoken, gentle, Middle-America kind of people, extremely clever, extremely articulate, and extremely humble. Everything about them, from their achievements to the way they speak, throws you back to what America used to (and was supposed to) be in the first place; a feeling enhanced by footage of the whole world (yes, including the French) cheering and waving U.S. flags to celebrate Apollo 11's landing on the moon -- a togetherness it's hard to imagine happening again in today's world. The film's music, composed by Philip Sheppard, is the movie's other big strength: powerful, emotional, stirring, it's an impressive feat, especially considering this is Sheppard's first film score.

The directing itself is unexceptional, and you do get the feeling that the film just rides somewhat comfortably on its fantastic subject and all the fascinating men involved -- but in the end, that's enough for a terrific 90 minute doc, one which'll entertain you, educate you, elevate your spirits, and throw in a few things to ponder in the process. 8/10

Enchanted


Enchanted had a one-off screening at the festival, making it its World Premiere, two months before the film's actual release in the UK (which'll come in the middle of December). It was a big promotional event for Disney, who treated every audience member to a free magic eight ball (woo-hoo!), and made sure the movie's three main stars were present and in a good mood to get some buzz going.

Enchanted tells the story of animated princess Gisele (Amy Adams), who is about to marry animated Prince Edward (James Marsden), which'll make her Queen of Andalasia in stead of evil Queen Narissa (Susan Sarandon). To save her throne, Narissa pushes Gisele into a magic well, that leads into an world where there are NO happy ever afters -- ours. More specifically, New York City, where Gisele meets a handsome divorce lawyer (Patrick Dempsey), who introduces her to her new environment...

It's an idea that could've been developed into a sickly-sweet film, aimed squarely at teenage girls and their parents. But Disney and director Kevin Lima (Tarzan, A Goofy Movie) instead make the concept blossom, and develop it into an extremely entertaining movie, one that even I, a 20-something male whose favorite films include The Godfather and Braveheart, thoroughly enjoyed. In fact, there's a lot of satire and irony in the film that I'm not sure kids would get, but that made all the grown-ups in the audience piss themselves, and that's not something that happens very often with movies about Disney princesses.

Most of the humor in the film comes from the culture crash between members of two very distinct worlds: the classic Disney cartoon world and our real-life world. Gisele, a gorgeous young princess, is used to improvising love duets, marrying Prince Charmings she barely met, cutting dresses out of curtains and rugs, and counting forest animals amongst her friends (and housekeeping mates). But suddenly, she finds herself in a world where no one sings, there are supposedly no happily ever afters, and people, well...date before deciding to marry.

The film is well, but not uniquely, written, but flies along at a very fun, breezy pace. The actors have a great time, and most of them are pretty much terrific -- Amy Adams is fantastic casting as the princess, and even though one might blame her for just taking on yet another pretty-ditzy role, she still delivers every inch of the way. James Marsden, who is the only person I can think of ever to get typecast as "the likeable other guy" (see the X-Men movies, Superman Returns, and The Notebook), is a revelation as Prince Edward, and overall gets the most laughs of anyone in the movie. He plays your typical overjoyful, overconfident, overperfect, overzealous storybook prince with glee and an absolute straight face, and as such pulls off the very rare feat of creating a character who is deeply likeable because of all his flaws. Patrick Dempsey is great casting too, and even though his role isn't exactly a stretch in any direction, he fills it solidly, hitting the beats and making every situation work. There's also a great animated chipmunk in there, one of the few CGI-animals-in-a-live-action-film I've ever seen work so well.

The one disappointment, really, is Susan Sarandon, who is terribly miscast as evil queen Narissa. She just tries too hard to be over-the-top and cartoonish, and as a result is simply ridiculous, working all right in the animated portions of the film, but looking ludicrous in the live-action bits -- like a thesp who takes herself very seriously, but to prove that she doesn't, takes a fun popcorn role and, hamming up way too seriously, comes out looking like a desperate middle-aged woman in a funny outfit, trying too hard to be wacky. Dempsey's to-be NYC girlfriend, played by Idina Menzel, is also somewhat annoying and miscast, but her role not being gigantic, it's not much of a bother.

There are also a few situations that the film fails to exploit fully, and even though the songs are composed by legend Alan Menken (an EIGHT-time Oscar winner) and do stick in your head, the way they are orchestrated in the couple of musical numbers ruins them. The choreographies in the musical numbers aren't very impressive either, and on a whole the numbers themselves are disappointing. The very final act is also quite disappointing (it throws the necessary CGI-packed climax at a film that never really needed it).

Nevertheless, it's a great film, really good fun, especially if you enjoy Disney films (even if you don't admit it) or if you have a little girl to take out to see it. 8/10


The Assassination Of Jesse James By The Coward Robert Ford


This is one of the films I was looking forward to the most in this year's lineup -- I'm a huge fan of Ron Hansen's book, I'm a huge fan of westerns, I'm a huge fan of the cast (Brad Pitt, Sam Shepard, Casey Affleck, Sam Rockwell -- how right can you go?), and the early buzz has been quite good, comparing the film to some of the 70s greats.

Let's say it straight-out: the film's far from perfect. In fact, it's far from even being the film it could be. It feels over-edited (director Andrew Dominik's spent a year in the cutting room) and somewhat without a center, shooting for a theme but not quite bringing it together as poetically and humanly as it could and should.

As a result the film is edited in fade-outs, like little vignettes, and features what felt like wall-to-wall narration from an omniscient storyteller. The idea is obvious -- to make the film feel like a yarn told by a frontier storyteller, which is the tone of Hansen's novel -- but the filmmakers sacrifice the story's power and potential on the altar of that form. Some of the important transition and human bits are left out of the story, and eventually, it definitely feels like someone is telling you a yarn, but not the most interesting one -- it's like Grandpa is reading you a story, but leaving out most of the good bits.

The movie isn't a bad one in any way -- it's a good film, but it could've been a great western, as far as I'm concerned an all-time great. It looks fantastic -- absolutely breathtaking for most shots -- the music by Nick Cave and Warren Ellis is brilliant (and I wish had been used more in place of the irritating narration, which just tended to tell us everything that we could already see happening on screen), the costume and set design looks deliciously authentic, and the acting is all-around top-notch. Brad Pitt is great as Jesse James, a man whose larger-than-life character slowly turns mercurial and paranoid, but there again the edit cuts out many of the important transition points in his character's arc, which has the effect of making his performance seem less impressive than it actually is (I think). The supporting cast is stunning, from Sam Rockwell (who steals every single scene he's in, which is pretty much what you pay Sam Rockwell to do) to little-known Garret Dillahunt, magistral as an awkward, frightened member of the James Gang. Zooey Deschanel makes a solid cameo near the end, and two of the bigger names in the cast (Mary-Louise Parker and Sam Shepard) take rather unnoticeable turns, but there again it could be the editing shaping their performance into something less defined than it could've been.

Surprisingly (to me), considering how much praise his performance has received so far, I thought Casey Affleck's performance was unexceptional, nothing special -- he takes the obvious path of making Robert Ford your pale-faced, awkward kid with a cracking voice and tender eyes, the victim of bullies who suddenly turns the biggest of all bullies into his own victim. But he never fully creates Ford's darker side, his ambition, his own mercurial side, all those things that, in a way, do make him like Jesse James -- only a weaker Jesse James, one without courage or pride. As a result you never quite feel James and Ford connect in the way they should: as Mary perfectly put it when we left the screening, this is essentially All About Eve, and where Pitt does (in my opinion) a fantastic Margo Channing, at first captivating and entrancing and likeable, then fearsome and paranoid, Affleck's Eve Harrington is too simple, too obvious. Jesse's his hero, he wants to be like Jesse, turns out Jesse isn't that nice a guy, so the best way to become as famous as him AND not be bullied anymore is to shoot Jesse. Only it's not that simple: in actuality, Ford was someone who went from wanting to be like Jesse, to wanting to be with Jesse, to wanting to be respected by Jesse, to wanting to BE Jesse; but since he didn't have any of the few qualities that made Jesse James such a larger-than-life character, he ended up going about it the way most of us would've, by waiting until the last possible moment and then, motivated by fear and greed rather than something undefinable, shooting his prey in the back, in his own house, while backed up by his brother.

Again, it might be the fault of the way the film is cut together (incredibly, the very important beat where Robert Ford turns from James gang member to government snitch is just plain missing from the film), but it's another reason why the piece doesn't completely click.

In the end, what could've been The Godfather or Unforgiven or Once Upon A Time In The West comes out more like The Proposition or Open Range -- a good-to-great western, but not a masterpiece. The shame is, that masterpiece is probably on the cutting room floor somewhere, already shot and performed, but probably never to be seen. 7.5/10

Saturday, October 20, 2007

"Gone" World Premiere!

A quick post to let everyone know that Gone, written/directed/produced by Mary Kerr, and starring Jenny O'Reilly and Kate Wyvill has just had its World Premiere at the St. John's International Women's Film Festival in St. John's, Canada.

Worth sharing as it's the first film either Mary or I have been involved in to get to screen in front of a paying audience (yay!), and as this festival is a fairly big festival of its kind (for instance, Mary's film screened in the same program as a film by Isabella Rossellini, and other films selected for the festival include the award-winning Soft, the best short film I've seen in a film festival this year, which has also screened at the NY Short Film Festival and the Edinburgh Film Festival), which is a long-overdue and much-deserved little tidbit of recognition for Mary and her film -- in my opinion a really cool, original short.

So, there -- a bit of bragging. :) I'll be back later on tomorrow with a bit more news, and something of a report on what we've been seeing at the London Film Festival.

Cheers,

TenCents

Thursday, October 04, 2007


Turns out blogs are hard to keep up. :)

I'll try to do better in the future, but until then, here's a bit of information about how things have been going since I last posted -- the Cannes Film Festival.

I spent the first couple of months of the summer back in New York, doing some work. It was an odd few weeks -- to save some money, we took a cheap sublet in Chinatown, and my God, Chinatown is a hostile place. It's funny how, where Little Italy is like a Disneyland version of Italy, Chinatown is properly like China. It's a whole different world, and oddly not a welcoming one. There's this feeling of a mass there, of people just trudging along rather than elevating themselves (which is one of the most amazing aspects of New York usually -- people are vibrant), and a hostile fear of anything different or unusual or unexpected. And, to call a cat a cat, the hygiene's pretty dodgy too. So we worked with that for a while, and then flew back to London for a wedding. Shortly after that, Maz and I took a road trip around the Scottish Highlands, which was an amazing experience -- we started down in Jedburgh, in the Borders, and then worked our way up the East Coast, to Inverness, then along the North Coast, and then back down the West Coast, all the way to Oban, and from there drove to Glasgow, from where we flew to Barra (the ONLY place in the world where the plane lands on the beach -- natch) for a few days, then back to Glasgow, from where we drove to Peebles and back to Jedburgh.

It was a fantastic thing to do (Maz's idea, to give credit where credit is due), and at the right time, too. You develop tunnel vision, working in something like the film industry, trying to get ahead -- you forget about anything else. You wake up, look up film news, work on film stuff, go see a movie, work on some film stuff, go to bed, start again. Even when you're not doing film-related stuff, you're thinking about it, it's dancing in the back of your head, it's worrying you, it's obsessing you. Every disappointment sticks with you like a bad smell, and every success only serves to make you worry about the next step. Ultimately you just end up running in circles, more busy than productive, trying to check things off your To-Do List rather than actually growing in any way. And Maz and I had both gotten to that point in the past few months. I personally had been focusing way too hard on how to get that short film finally off the ground, on how to get onto Indiana Jones 4, on how to find a producer I respected to work for, on how to make a living, on how to find a project to produce next...And for weeks I had been trying so hard to get it all done, I stopped getting anywhere.

So the road trip was really good -- couple of weeks with virtually no Internet, no cinemas, just talking and doing things and landscapes and reading and writing. Suddenly rather than anxiously bouncing in every purposeless direction, every day narrowed down to getting into the car, going somewhere fun, and having fun -- and talking in-between. Scotland's a gorgeous country, one where the landscapes, history and activities combine to instantly make all the bad energies just seep out -- and I personally came back from it in the best headspace I've been in in months.

And unsurprisingly, since getting back, things have been going much, MUCH better. After obsessing over it every single day since January (I'm serious.), I finally got my few days' work on Indiana Jones & The Kingdom Of The Crystal Skull, worked on the same set as Steven Spielberg, and saw Harrison Ford in the outfit -- it cost me nearly a grand for the privilege, flying to L.A. and putting myself up and working for free, but fuck, man, it's Indiana Jones. I can't talk about it much, non-disclosure agreement oblige, but it was a great experience, and as far as I'm concerned the film looks amazing fun. After it comes out, I'll post a longer post with the bits I saw, how they did them, and what was great about them -- and hopefully Lucasfilm won't sue me then. :)

I also started doing some book reading for Walt Disney Studios, and a bit after that, I got to work on a series of commercials for H&M, as a camera trainee for one of my all-time favorite DPs, Darius Khondji. We've also gotten a film into a film festival, and I've initiated contact with a bunch of directors and writers I'd like to work with as a full-fledged producer, and things are going well.

It's funny how things aren't always necessarily about putting your mind to it, but putting your right mind to it. Trust me, the world's full of driven people, but driven people who go about things in the right way, with the right mindset, beating their own drum at their own pace... I truly think that's one of the keys of getting wherever you're going. I'm not one of those people yet, not consistently, but I'm starting to tell when I'm in that mode and when I'm not, and I can tell the (huge) difference.

I'll keep this a short post -- no point writing too much today, and then not doing it for a month, as I tend to -- but I'll be back over the weekend, asking myself several questions that have been swimming around in my head, all centered around one issue: why is the film industry so keen on killing itself?

Friday, June 22, 2007

Cannes Pictures!

First off -- apologies for the low-res quality of the pictures, they're Duane Reade-made CD versions of what came off our disposable cameras (which we were excited about when we bought them -- it was like 1996 all over again -- until we got the pics printed and were reminded of the crap quality and silvery-gray color of disposable camera pictures. Oh, well). In any case, here's hoping you enjoy...

The entrance to the Palais des Festivals -- and the famous steps...


The blue steps leading to the Un Certain Regard screening room (at the other end of the Palais), where Martin Scorsese's Masterclass also took place.

Martin Scorsese making his entrance before the Masterclass

Scorsese accepting his minutes-long standing ovation before the beginning of the class

From L to R: a translator, the Directors' Fortnight host, Gregg Araki,
Anna Faris and Danny Masterson before the Smiley Face showing
(gotta love sitting in the balcony)

Maz working away in our little hotel room...


...and the mess of film magazines and trade papers we had around
every morning

The Across The Universe billboard on the side of the Hilton

The Carlton hotel -- during the Festival, also known as
"The Biggest Billboard In The World"

20th Century Fox's undeniably badass FF2: Rise Of The Silver Surfer display


Quentin Tarantino introducing the Cannes Classics screening of
Rio Bravo (also attended by Edgar Wright)

During the Festival, the city organized for some very cool see-through banners,
with pictures of screaming movie stars printed on them, to be hung over the Rue d'Antibes (Cannes' biggest shopping street). Here: Matt Damon and Tom Hanks.


An advance poster of the upcoming DeNiro & Pacino event film "Righteous Kill". The film hasn't started production yet (it does in August), but as it's an indie, its producers went all-out in Cannes trying to attract financiers and foreign rights buyers. You spend some to get some, I guess.
A banner for the upcoming The Broken, starring Lena Headey (300) and directed by Sean Ellis, who directed Cashback (the short) and Cashback (the feature).

The now-famous Simpsons Movie display (as seen in every multiplex in Amerika).

The outside of Cannes' train station, depicting the brothers Lumiere (inventors of cinema) watching frames of an early film of a train driving by. Think this is a cinema-loving town?

Wednesday, June 06, 2007

I wish I could write like this.


"So you think that money is the root of all evil?" said Francisco d'Anconia. "Have you ever asked what is the root of money? Money is a tool of exchange, which can't exist unless there are goods produced and men able to produce them. Money is the material shape of the principle that men who wish to deal with one another must deal by trade and give value for value. Money is not the tool of the moochers, who claim your product by tears, or of the looters, who take it from you by force. Money is made possible only by the men who produce. Is this what you consider evil?
"When you accept money in payment for your effort, you do so only on the conviction that you will exchange it for the product of the effort of others. It is not the moochers or the loots who give value to money. Not an ocean of tears nor all the guns in the world can transform those pieces of paper in your wallet into the bread you will need to survive tomorrow. Those pieces of paper, which should have been gold, are a token of honor--your claim upon the energy of the men who produce. Your wallet is your statement of hope that somewhere in the world around you there are men who will not default on that moral principle which is the root of money. Is this what you consider evil?
"Have you ever looked for the root of production? Take a look at an electric generator and dare tell yourself that it was created by the muscular effort of unthinking brutes. Try to grow a seed of wheat without the knowledge left to you by men who had to discover it for the first time. Try to obtain your food by means of nothing but physical motions--and you'll learn that man's mind is the root of all the goods produced and of all the wealth that has ever existed on earth.
"But you say that money is made by the strong at the expense of the weak? What strength do you mean? It is not the strength of guns or muscles. Wealth is the product of man's capacity to think. Then is money made by the man who invents a motor at the expense of those who did not invent it? Is money made by the intelligent at the expense of the fools? By the able at the expense of the incompetent? By the ambitious at the expense of the lazy? Money is MADE--before it can be looted or mooched--made by the effort of every honest man, each to the extent of his ability. An honest man is one who knows that he can't consume more than he has produced.
"To trade by means of money is the code of the men of good will. Money rests on the axiom that every man is the owner of his mind and his effort. Money allows no power to prescribe the value of your effort except the voluntary choice of the man who is willing to trade you his effort in return. Money permits you to obtain for your goods and your labor that which they are worth to the men who buy them, but no more. Money permits no deals except those to mutual benefit by the unforced judgment of the traders. Money demands of you the recognition that men must work for their own benefit, not for their own injury, for their gain, not their loss--the recognition that they are not beasts of burden, born to carry the weight of your misery--that you must offer them values, not wounds--that the common bond among men is not the exchange of suffering, but the exchange of GOODS. Money demands that you sell, not your weakness to men's stupidity, but your talent to their reason; it demands that you buy, not the shoddiest they offer, but the best that your money can find. And when men live by trade--with reason, not force, as their final arbiter--it is the best product that wins, the best performance, the man of best judgment and highest ability--and the degree of a man's productiveness is the degree of his reward. This is the code of existence whose tool and symbol is money. Is this what you consider evil?
"But money is only a tool. It will take you wherever you wish, but it will not replace you as the driver. It will give you the means for the satisfaction of your desires, but it will not provide you with desires. Money is the scourge of the men who attempt to reverse the law of causality--the men who seek to replace the mind by seizing the products of the mind.
"Money will not purchase happiness for the man who has no concept of what he wants: money will not give him a code of values, if he's evaded the knowledge of what to value, and it will not provide him with a purpose, if he's evaded the choice of what to seek. Money will not buy intelligence for the fool, or admiration for the coward, or respect for the incompetent. The man who attempts to purchase the brains of his superiors to serve him, with his money replacing his judgment, ends up by becoming the victim of his inferiors. The men of intelligence desert him, but the cheats and the frauds come flocking to him, drawn by a law which he has not discovered: that no man may be smaller than his money. Is this the reason why you call it evil?
"Only the man who does not need it, is fit to inherit wealth--the man who would make his own fortune no matter where he started. If an heir is equal to his money, it serves him; if not, it destroys him. But you look on and you cry that money corrupted him. Did it? Or did he corrupt his money? Do not envy a worthless heir; his wealth is not yours and you would have done no better with it. Do not think that it should have been distributed among you; loading the world with fifty parasites instead of one, would not bring back the dead virtue which was the fortune. Money is a living power that dies without its root. Money will not serve the mind that cannot match it. Is this the reason why you call it evil?
"Money is your means of survival. The verdict you pronounce upon the source of your livelihood is the verdict you pronounce upon your life. If the source is corrupt, you have damned your own existence. Did you get your money by fraud? By pandering to men's vices or men's stupidity? By catering to fools, in the hope of getting more than your ability deserves? By lowering your standards? By doing work you despise for purchasers you scorn? If so, then your money will not give you a moment's or a penny's worth of joy. Then all the things you buy will become, not a tribute to you, but a reproach; not an achievement, but a reminder of shame. Then you'll scream that money is evil. Evil, because it would not pinch-hit for your self-respect? Evil, because it would not let you enjoy your depravity? Is this the root of your hatred of money?
"Money will always remain an effect and refuse to replace you as the cause. Money is the product of virtue, but it will not give you virtue and it will not redeem your vices. Money will not give you the unearned, neither in matter nor in spirit. Is this the root of your hatred of your money?
"Or did you say it's the LOVE of money that's the root of all evil? To love a thing is to know and love its nature. To love money is to know and love the fact that money is the creation of the best power within you, and your passkey to trade your effort for the effort of the best among men. It's the person who would sell his soul for a nickel, who is loudest in proclaiming his hatred for money--and he has good reason to hate it. The lovers of money are willing to work for it. They know they are able to deserve it.
"Let me give you a tip on a clue to men's characters: the man who damns money has obtained it dishonorably; the man who respects it has earned it.
"Run for your life from any man who tells you that money is evil. That sentence is the leper's bell of an approaching looter. So long as men live together on earth and need means to deal with one another--their only substitute, if they abandon money, is the muzzle of a gun.
"Watch money. Money is the barometer of a society's virtue. When you see that trading is done, not by consent, but by compulsion--when you see that in order to produce, you need to obtain permission from men who produce nothing--when you see that money is flowing to those who deal, not in goods, but in favors--when you see that men get richer by graft and by pull than by work, and your laws don't protect you against them, but protect them against you--when you see corruption being rewarded and honesty becoming a self-sacrifice--you may know that your society is doomed.
"When you have made evil the means of survival, do not expect men to remain good. Do not expect them to stay moral and lose their lives for the purpose of becoming the fodder of the immoral. Do not expect them to produce, when production is punished and looting rewarded. Do not ask, 'Who is destroying the world?' You are."

-- Ayn Rand, Atlas Shrugged

Sunday, June 03, 2007

Cleveland's in the Finals!

Cleveland's in the Finals! Cleveland's in the Finals! Cleveland's in the Finals! Cleveland's in the Finals! Cleveland's in the Finals! Cleveland's in the Finals! Cleveland's in the Finals! Cleveland's in the Finals! Cleveland's in the Finals! Cleveland's in the Finals! Cleveland's in the Finals! Cleveland's in the Finals! Cleveland's in the Finals!

Woo-hoo!

Tuesday, May 29, 2007

Cannes 2007 (Day Three)

Welcome welcome, to our last day in Cannes. It's more of a day and a half -- the last Friday and then half the day on Saturday -- but for the purposes of this post, let's consider it one day, as we had a nice, easy-going end to our festival.

Thursday night was Ocean's Thirteen premiere night, which made the whole town buzz -- everyone trying to get an eye on George and Brad and Angelina -- but we also learned a few days later that the cast and crew of Entourage also shot their season finale in Cannes, using the Ocean's premiere as a stand-in for the boys' own fictional premiere. So they had the Entourage cast (Grenier, Dillon & co.) walk up the red carpet after the Ocean's cast, making it even more of a crazy evening. And that also explained why the cast (including badass Jeremy Piven) kept popping up at events in Cannes, despite not having anything to plug at the fest -- they were filming their season finale. That's one episode I can't wait to see.

In any case, this means we took Thursday evening, as I mentioned in my previous post, to go see Smiley Face (shame on me!), which means we had a late night (again) and, added to our jet lag, explains why we slept in really, REALLY late (trust me) on Friday morning. We ended up spending most of the day in the hotel room or on the hotel room balcony, going through all the reading we had collected since arriving in Cannes -- Variety, Hollywood Reporter, film catalogues, Cahiers du Cinema, British Cinematographer Magazine, and many, many more. In the evening, we went to see Rio Bravo (one of the all-time great westerns) on a big screen, screened as part of the Festival's Classics collection, and that turned out to be a great experience -- not only did we see Malcolm McDowell (of Clockwork Orange) before the screening, but it was also attended and introduced by Quentin Tarantino (along with his "little brother" Edgar Wright), who described the film as one of his all-time favorites, said the characters in it were like surrogate fathers to him as he grew up, and also said that one of his criteria for women he dates is to show them Rio Bravo and make sure they like it. We also got to watch the film (definitely one of the best westerns ever -- if you haven't seen it, do it. Now. I'm serious. Stop reading this, open your Netflix queue, find it, put it at the top, and give back all the Netflix DVDs you have at home now so you're sure it comes really quick. And then the second it gets to you, sit down, watch it, enjoy, and come back and read the rest of this. Seriously. Go.) with a crowd of real film geeks, who'd applaud every time a baddie got killed, laughed and all the right lines, and all, including Maz and I, fell in love with Angie Dickinson every time she graced the screen. All in all, it was a great experience -- and without a doubt, ironically, the best film we saw at the festival.

We took an equally slow day Saturday -- the whole day was a stormy rain-out, and so we decided against waiting in line for 3hrs in the morning to see We Own The Night (which we're still amazingly excited to see), packed our bags, and went and had a nice long lunch by the sea (and sheltered from the rain). We then had a last coffee with Richard, who, amazing as usual, revealed that he had kept a bunch of Festival-related stuff (and this amazing book about Cinecitta) to give to us before we let, and then that's just what we did -- we left.

All in all, it was a terrific three days, just mind-blowing, mostly thanks to all the efforts my dad and Richard and everyone who helped us out gave to make sure we would get into some of the most exclusive events of the film year. Cannes is definitely no Sundance -- it's amazingly exclusive, a little pompous, and to be honest unless you've got tickets to everything, or a film screening of your own, or films to sell or buy, it's a hard festival to go to and freely enjoy. We do plan on coming back next year -- with a short, who knows? -- but it's definitely more of a "look at us, we've made it" festival (rather than a "we're gonna f**king make it someday" festival, which is what Sundance is), and that might be something we'll enjoy better later on in our lives. Even then -- a really great three days, which I hope I've described here in a decent fashion, and now...well, now...

...now we're back to work.

Sunday, May 27, 2007

Cannes 2007 (Day Two)

Day Two. It's Thursday, in Cannes, and the highlight of our day today is what we came to Cannes for: the Film Masterclass with Martin Scorsese.

Scheduling didn't work out great -- one of the films I had been dying to see at the festival was The Diving Bell & The Butterfly, directed by notorious asshole painter Julian Schnabel, but also produced by Frank Marshall and Kathleen Kennedy who, other than being amongst the best producers in America (and most definitely the best inside the studio system), also happen to be Steven Spielberg's producers, and producers of Indiana Jones 4 (and so people I've been keeping track of for a while now). In any case, that film's last screening took place in the same time as the Masterclass, which we could definitely not skip, so I missed out on seeing it. But the Masterclass more than more than MORE than made up for any disappointment I might've greedily had.

The Cannes filmmaker Masterclasses started, I think, sixteen or seventeen years ago, as one of the events of the fortnight -- a 2hr "class" in which a great filmmaker would teach about his career and what he learned going through it, sharing his thoughts and experiences with (in this year's case) 1,200 various film students and professionals. Previous hosts of the Cinema Masterclass have included Stephen Frears, Wong Kar Wai, Nanni Morretti and Sydney Pollack. To see any of these give a class on filmmaking would be an amazing experience, but Scorsese, to me, was more than that -- it's like a dream. My two favorite directors, in my opinion the two best directors of their time, are Steven Spielberg and Martin Scorsese. They are artists, in the sense that they have vision, they have daring, they have a very strong personality that shows through every second of their work -- but also entertainers, aware and respectful of their audience, always trying to push the envelope of what new lands you can take viewers to. Because of the cursing and the violence in Scorsese's films, I didn't really get to see any growing up, but my dad would speak about him, and I remembered his then-funny sounding name when I got around to seeing more "grown-up" films. And so after growing up on things like Raiders Of The Lost Ark, Back To The Future, E.T., or Star Wars, suddenly I was watching things like Goodfellas, Mean Streets, Casino, Taxi Driver, Raging Bull. Stuff of such intensity and virtuosity and that had such a certain specific taste (there's a way DeNiro, Pesci and Keitel spoke, and moved, and the rhythms of the editing and the cuts in those movies that's just unique), and that I think no one has emulated since. In terms of sheer filmmaking, I think Raging Bull, in the history of film, is the 2nd best film ever, second only to The Godfather. Both are so perfect, so gorgeously acted, so well-designed that every shot could be framed and put in a museum. And when I grew up, I realized that not only had Scorsese had the most consistently amazing career of any filmmaker I could think of, but also that he had made such different movies (from Mean Streets to a small comedy like After Hours to a period piece like The Age Of Innocence to a musical like New York, New York). Spielberg and Scorsese, to me, are the epitome of what a director should be, and part of the reason I now want to produce -- because I want to make movies like theirs, and know I could never direct them.

A bit more than a year ago, I had the chance to see a night of shooting on The Departed in Brooklyn. I went with my then-neighbor Lauren, who was hoping to see Leo or Matt or Markie Mark. What we did see is a small crew, Scorsese there, shooting an insert something like 27 times. Lauren left after fifteen minutes -- I stayed for two hours. I watched the crew work, how silent and efficient they were (apparently a staple of a Scorsese crew), and I caught a few glimpses of Scorsese himself, which at the time (and still today, would) made my day.

To now see him and listen to him as he taught a class -- that was, to call things what they are, a fucking dream. To make things even more incredible, Richard not only wrangled us entry to the masterclass, but got us VIP tickets -- meaning we were the first to enter into the auditorium, and got to sit at aisle seats three rows from the stage. Which means that, when Scorsese entered, he walked by inches from us -- inches -- and then we could hear him speak from such a close distance it was like being in a small room with him.

The Masterclass was the event of the 2nd week -- amongst the crowd in the auditorium, just a few rows behind us, were Quentin Tarantino, Edgar Wright (director of and Shaun Of The Dead and Hot Fuzz), Claude Lanzmann (director of the acclaimed, and life-changing, documentary Shoah, amongst other things) and the now familiar face of Brett Ratner. These guys provided Maz and I with a show even before Scorsese ever entered the room -- and with our little people-watching hobby, we had a ball of a time. We noticed Ratner before anyone else did (to be fair, no one really did). He was sitting next to this pretty-ish girl, and he was all over her, leaning one arm over the back of the seat in front of him, the other one touching, stroking, and grabbing away at her. She was looking away, definitely not very taken (although if she wasn't, how did she end up next to him? Did they get reserved seats, or did they just end up right next to one another out of pure chance, or did he pick his seat because of her, and if he did, why did he, considering she was pretty but by no means a model, his prey of choice?). At some point, Ratner leaned over and tried to grab what was either her arm, or her boob, and she exasperatedly smacked his arm away, kind of pushed him back, and resumed looking away. Now Ratner joined her, looking away too, the expression on his face that of a fat, spoiled kid after being refused his 7th slice of chocolate cake. Or that of a bully who's been called out on being a prick by the one girl he claims is his girlfriend. Just angry, slightly shamed, frustrated.

And things were only about to get worse. This is about the time when Quentin Tarantino, along with puppy dog Edgar Wright (and I call him "puppy dog" because Wright followed Tarantino everywhere throughout the festival, the expression on his face that of a child begging for approval, his clean-shaven cheeks a little chubby and self-satisfied -- another, in my opinion, blatant case of geeky insecurity suddenly magnified by relative fame, praise and success). Everyone in the room noticed Tarantino -- either turning around from their seats in the first rows, or leaning down from the balcony, to take a look at him -- and three or four dozen people actually got up to take pictures of him. It was interesting to watch Tarantino (a man with legendary ego-issues himself) and the way he reacted to an amount of attention you can tell he now considers normal, well-deserved, and customary -- but it was even more interesting to watch Brett Ratner's reaction, and the jealousy that so obviously started pouring through his veins the second the hubbub started. He began by ignoring the commotion -- apparently hoping it would just die off -- and when it became painfully clear that it wouldn't (and when his pout got so tight I think it gave him lip cramps), Ratner then made an emphatic show of getting up, yelling out Tarantino's name, and waving at him like they were old buddies. He also tried to start a bit of a conversation -- but Tarantino (who obviously knew Ratner, but not that well), eager to get back to all the hero worship, soon politely cut the chat short, sat back down and went back to grinning and thumbs-uping people he never even met before in his life. Defeated, Ratner gave one more go at getting attention, by bitching at a couple of film buffs who had stepped in front of his seat to get a good shot of Tarantino on their cameras -- complaining, best of all, that their flashes were blinding him so close to his face, when the flashes, how to say, were so obviously directed in another direction altogether -- and then resumed his quest to win the World Pouting Championships.

(Also please notice on the picture above how, while everyone else at the Masterclass was urged to come dressed in "formal wear" and pretty much turned away at the door if they hadn't, QT showed up at his reserved seat dressed in, well...shorts and a Batman logo wife-beater. Ah, formal wear ain't what it used to be...)

Then came the man everyone had really come to see -- Martin Scorsese. The man was amazingly graceful, funny, and, as you can tell from any interview or press conference he's ever given, absolutely obsessed with and dedicated to film. Not a second of the Masterclass Q&A (hosted by film critic and close friend of the late Stanley Kubrick, Michel Ciment) was dedicated to red carpets, celebrities, egoes, or money -- it was all pure, down-and-out filmmaking, the art and craft, the passion, the love for it in itself and nothing else. Scorsese, at core, is a film geek, a film buff -- if he ever became a filmmaker, it was to make films, period. No fortune and glory, no superstar fantasies -- just making movies. And after spending so much time with people whose only ambition is to be in the spotlight, and still dare call themselves actors; or people whose only ambition is to have power over people, and still dare call themselves directors; or people whose only goal is to make money, and still dare call themselves producers; it was, to put it mildly, fucking orgasmic to see someone to whom those thoughts would never even occur unless brought up by someone else.

A few highlights of the Class (the majority of which could be found as a podcast online last week -- not sure if that's still up on the festival's website):

-- Scorsese is aware he's never really shot any sex scenes (not since Mean Streets, in any case), and he admits that it's because he wouldn't know how to film them. He does say he "would like to, someday. Maybe." In terms of how he shoots violence, he did point out that very often, when there is violence on the screen is the one time he'll deliberately move the camera very slowly, or not at all, and let the violence itself hit the audience, creating contrast with his usual, free-wheeling moving camera style. He also said he doesn't believe there is such a thing as "senseless" or gratuitous violence, and that it always, when shown, expresses a point of view, a reality.

-- Scorsese, famously, got into movies because his family were working class and never read books, films becoming his literature: "My parents were (...) not in the habit of reading books, so they only thing they could do with me was take me to the movie theater. Ultimately, the connection to cinema and movies was made emotionally, through my parents, through the movies they watched. That's the driving obsession, the emotional connection to film for me."

-- Scorsese mentioned a few of the films that impressed him when he grew up -- mentioning, of course, On The Waterfront as the first film that gave him a consciousness that film could be about him, and his friends, and their daily lives. He also dropped that "East Of Eden became almost a religious obsession with me."

-- He talked a bit about how he started realizing the power of film as a medium: "I began to wonder why I was feeling a certain way at a certain point in that film. And then I noticed a camera position or an actor. An example from Bonnie & Clyde: There’s a scene where Gene Hackman gets shot in the eye. And I imagined that as a close-up. I went to see the film again; it’s a medium shot. Why did I see it so close in my head? Sound effects, editing, position of the gun in the frame, all these things made me understand that you can actually construct images that tell a story. I became conscious of camera movement when I began to realize how certain scenes are made and why I was affected certain ways. But I really think it was through American musicals and the use of camera movement by Fellini, and the freedom of the camera in the French New Wave. I think it has more to do with choreography."

-- About what it takes to be a filmmaker: "You don’t really need to go to film school to learn how to watch a film. You can learn everything you need to know with your eyes. The only way you really learn is to make a film. You have to have an obsessive nature, I think. You have to want to make the film more than anything else in life, I’m sorry to say."

--
On what he learned making Mean Streets: "For (that) it took me three years. Harvey Keitel was a court stenographer at the time. After three weeks we ran out of money. I’d call him again 6 months later. He would complain: ‘I have a life, I have a job.’ What I learned is that at least we got through the process. And any film that you do is a marathon."

-- On what he learned working for Roger Corman (on Boxcar Bertha): "I learned discipline. Going there, doing your work, even when you don’t feel like it. What he did, is he taught me how to make a picture in 24 days."

-- On how he was introduced to Robert DeNiro (Scorsese has often said that, even though DeNiro hung out as a kid just a few blocks from him, they never really met, as just a few blocks downtown at that time was a whole different world): "It was at a Christmas dinner. He talked about all these people he knew. He used to hang out in a different group, but I remembered him. He was 16 and so was I back then. He knew the people that I made Who's That Knocking at My Door about. And he knew the people I wanted to make Mean Streets about. I didn’t know until many years later that his father was a painter, that we were not from the same class."

-- He also talked about improv, and how whenever he does improv, what he means is "improvisational dialogue" -- as in, he'll let the actors improv the lines, but not the whole scene, their objective remaining the same as was written in the script. He also says that improv he'll never shoot in a closeup -- that the whole idea of improv is to get people's reactions, the freshness and the realness that they suddenly have when they don't know what the other actor is going to do. Scorsese especially mentioned the "Funny how?" scene in Goodfellas, saying that the whole idea of letting Joe Pesci riff in that context was to create that genuine atmosphere of mixed camaraderie and menace, or fear, and that was achieved because everyone at that table, including Ray Liotta and Pesci himself, had no clue what Pesci was going to next -- when he was going to reveal the joke and how, and how far he would go before he did. As a result, the scene gets an energy it would never have had otherwise -- and if you look at the scene as it is in the film, you'll notice both shots (both the one on Pesci and the one on Liotta) are wide enough to include all the other actors, and their laughs, reactions, and interventions are what make the scene as funny, tense, and captivating as it is.

-- Scorsese also said that, more than just artistic reasons (although there were some), in the first place he started considering shooting Raging Bull in black and white because a) at that time he started realizing that color film faded more rapidly than B&W film, and he wanted his film to last, and b) four other boxing films (including Rocky 2 and The Champ) were coming out that year, all very colorful and mainstream, and he wanted his film to stand out.

-- He also said that several of his most-acclaimed projects (from the aforementioned Raging Bull to After Hours to The King Of Comedy to Cape Fear to The Departed) were projects he originally didn't want to do, but upon reading the script he found that one very little scene or one little theme would fascinate him and obsess him, and he would then be driven to develop it, make it the focus of the film, and that is what would push him to make the film.
Those are highlights, obviously, as the class lasted an information-packed 2 hours, but these are the ones that I took notes on, or that come to mind as I type this.

Our only other stop that day (other than the customary Film Market and Village stops) was a late night Directors' Fortnight of comedy Smiley Face, starring Anna Faris. Smiley Face had been one of the film we had wanted to see at Sundance, and missed because of scheduling issues, so when we learned that it was playing in Cannes, we made sure to catch it -- especially considering several reviews, in several countries, had gotten the habit of calling it "the best stoner comedy ever made".

What it was, to be honest, was a massive disappointment, and one of the unfunniest, stupidest, most poorly made films I have seen in my life (and Maz agreed). Directed by Gregg Araki, one of the indie world's favorite directors (and who, despite being in his mid-40s, sounds and acts like a freshman girl from USC), the film was also his first comedy, and it showed. The script showed glimpses of potential, but the dreadfully poor directing killed off any ideas it might've had. The plot, as in all stoner movies, was expectedly weak (girl gets massively stoned, goes on weird adventures), and so a lot relies on how the gags are set up and executed, and it was obvious Araki had put no thought whatsoever into that. Everything was shot exactly as written, with no rhythm, no variety, no invention, no visual ideas, and a dreadful, dreadful choice of music (how does loud, crappy techno-metal fit either comedy or being massively stoned?).

The acting was just as bad -- Anna Faris (whom I otherwise love) is in every shot, and wears the exact same standard-stoned expression in every single one of them. The rest of the cast (Adam Brody in a sad, sad cameo; John Krasinski in a "hey, I gotta pay the rent" cameo; and Danny Masterson in a "what the fuck were you THINKING?" cameo) is equally stiff, bored, and uninvolved. The film itself is a painful experience -- if you took someone off death row and made them watch Smiley Face, they'd probably ask to be put back on death row. And then executed early. The rest of the audience, reassuringly, didn't seem to enjoy the film either -- the first 20 minutes or so were welcomed with hysterical laughter, the next 20 minutes saw a couple chuckles, and after that the cinema was as silent as a yet-to-be-discovered Egyptian tomb. Dead dead dead dead dead.

And that was our second day in Cannes -- now re-dubbed, in my mind, the really cool place where you get to learn, over and over and over again, how many dreadful movies are made (and somehow, celebrated) in the world...

Friday, May 25, 2007

Cannes 2007 (Day One)


Hey there. Promised I'd write. :)

It's the last day of the Cannes Film Festival 2007, and Maz and I have been here since Wednesday morning, enjoying our first experience of the fest, and God...has it been something.

A little bit of background to explain how we ended up here in the first place: we've been going around festivals for a year now, since we graduated film school, basically attending whenever we could and were available in-between working jobs, trying to meet people and make contacts and just get the whole vibe of the different festivals (easier to do if you don't have the pressure of a film to screen and sell on the first time -- you're free to just make your way around and see what's up). So up until we now we had been to the Edinburgh Film Festival, the London Film Festival, Sundance, the Berlinale, and Tribeca. Knowing we'd be in Europe during Cannes anyway (as we had to come back for visa reasons), when it was announced that Martin Scorsese would be giving the Masterclass at this year's festival, I emailed my dad and asked if he knew where that might be taking place and how to get entry. I didn't have very high hopes -- Cannes is the most notoriously difficult festival to get into, as absolutely everything requires an official pass for entry -- but I thought I'd ask, in any case to maybe have the information for the following year.

What followed was typical of my dad -- within a couple of weeks of sending that first email, we had invitations to the Masterclass, full accreditation to all the events of the Festival, and tickets to 2 evening premieres (the ones where you have to show up in a tux or evening dress and walk up the red carpet and steps of the Palais du Festival). Let's just say people who run hotels have more influence than you think. :)

So, thanks to this amazing show of support from the parents (it's an investment, you could say), Mary and I landed in Nice on a BA flight Wednesday morning at 9.30, to spend about three days here. From Nice, you drive about 30 minutes to Cannes, where all of the action takes place. We got lucky to get here in definitely Riviera-esque weather (some years, clouds and drizzle overtake the festival), and it's been hot and sunny beach weather all the way. For those of you who don't know this part of the Riviera, it pretty much looks and feels like California -- only quieter, more quaint, and full of French people. The whole Cannes - Antibes - St. Tropez area is very much a bunch of holiday resorts, ranging from the luxury (most parts of Cannes) to the hip and trendy (St. Tropez, famous since Brigitte Bardot spent her summers doing the twist on its beaches in the 60s).

Mary and I set ourselves at the Amarante Hotel -- a really great little hotel, with swimming pool, and the most grumpy, hostile and unprofessional staff you could ever conceive (it's so nice being back in France...) -- and walked down the 10mn walk to the Hilton on the Croisette, where we were to meet the man who helped make it all possible, Richard Duvauchelle, who is a friend of my dad's and general manager of the Cannes Hilton.

What follows is our trip.

Wednesday

Morning --
We meet Richard outside the Hilton, since we're not allowed in yet -- as the Hilton is one of the festival hubs, and houses screenings and events for the Directors' Fortnight, you need either a festival pass or a room key to get in. Richard meets us and escorts us to his office, where he has all our stuff -- and it turns out all of it is even better than we expected. The Masterclass tickets are VIP tickets -- which means we get to enter the room before everyone else, and are guaranteed good seats. He has two tickets to each of that evening's premieres for us (more on that later). He has our passes to the Film Market and daytime screenings. And, completely unexpectedly, he also has two invitations for a party that evening, at the Hotel du Cap in Cap d'Antibes (THE most exclusive hotel you could think of -- for instance, this year, Sharon Stone, George Clooney, Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie, amongst others, are staying there; and as we would learn later, rooms cost over a $1,000 a night, and much more for suites, people book months in advance, and management accepts nothing but cash), a party hosted in honor of Sharon Stone's AIDS fundraising efforts. (In the end, Sharon Stone never showed, and no kids with AIDS were invited -- but I'm sure they appreciated. *clears throat*)

We have lunch with Richard, and during lunch bump into Hubert Watrinet, one of the managing directors of the Directors' Fortnight, who gives us invitations to come anytime and have drinks in the Directors' Fortnight lounge, and also entry to whichever films of their selection they we'd like to see. For free.

And speaking of free, the Hilton is definitely a place we'll be coming back to every day -- they have all the daily trades (from the Hollywood Reporter to Variety to The Business) free for the taking in the middle of the lobby. And you can imagine how we are with free film stuff...

Afternoon -- Leaving the Hilton with several hours until our 7pm premiere (at which we only need to get to by 6 or 6.15), Maz and I decide to take a walk down the Croisette and into the Film Market. The Croisette is the long avenue going down Cannes right by the seaside, and during the Festival, it's covered in film posters and billboards, either advertising films soon to be released (as this the case, this year, for Evan Almighty, Bee Movie, or 88 Minutes), or advertising films looking for distribution (from Japanese films in the festival to Ealing Studios' upcoming crapfest St. Trinians), or even films on which not a single minute of pre-production has yet been spent and still looking for financing (most notably Roman Polanski's Pompeii, rumored to be budgeted at $130 million and to star Orlando Bloom and Scarlett Johansson -- probably because their acting is so bad they're the perfect choice to play people who will be molded still in dry lava; or Righteous Kill, the first film to star DeNiro and Pacino together since Heat, from a script by the guy who wrote Inside Man, and which was just announced last week -- and for which they already have a poster, a tagline, and investment contact info). There's also some really weird stuff advertised here and there -- most especially this thing called Illegal Aliens, which apparently stars the late Anna Nicole Smith, and described by the IMDB as "Charlie's Angels goes sci-fi, as 3 aliens morph into super-hot babes and arrive to protect the Earth from the intergalactic forces of evil" (good stuff).

So you walk down this strip of road, right by the beach, and there's all these billboards on your right (on the city side). The beach side is a succession of private clubs and party areas set up under big white tents (most of them hosted by cosmetics companies), followed by what is known in Cannes as "the Village". Now the Village (full name being the International Village) is quite a cool thing -- it's a succession of little white booths of sorts, where every country in the world with a film industry (or at least every single one I could think of) has a booth, and where they all promote their films, their filmmakers, and their country as a location and clever-investment haven. Unsure of how much time we have, Mary and I just pop into a few -- namely the Irish Film Council one, which Mary really digs because of the slate of very cool-looking films they're promoting; and the UK Film Council one, where we get to pack up on free short film DVDs -- but I want to spend some time later going into some of the ones I know very little about, African countries and Asian countries, and learn more about their incentives and their film industries and what's going on with them, just to get an idea of how international film is at this point. We also try getting into the American booth -- which is the only one that's the size of four booths, as indicated by its name, the American Pavilion, and by the fact that the flag dangling outside it is 4 times the size of any other flag on the strip -- but get turned down after the entrance area, as the American Pavilion is, also, the one and only Village booth to have security procedures and allow entrance only to authorized members. I see a pattern here...

From there on we move to the Film Market itself, which is housed under the main screening room at the Palais des Festivals, and is the biggest, most impressive film market you could think of -- it covers something like three full floors, and EVERYONE you could think of as a booth, of varying sizes, from big US houses like Lionsgate to little Indian production companies whose sole distribution prospect is a straight-to-video shop in Slough. It's fun walking around -- people mistakes us for buyers and try and invite us to buyer screenings of their Jesse Metcalfe-starring jungle epics -- but it serves mostly as a reminder of how many really, REALLY crappy films actually get made out there (this festival as a whole will keep reminding us of that).

After an hour or so of wandering, we head back to the hotel for a bit of rest and regrouping before our premieres. I take a quick look at the schedules, and am a bit disappointed -- most of the films we were itching to see here, such as The Diving Bell & The Butterfly, Sicko, No Country For Old Men or My Blueberry Nights, are long gone and have stopped screening, so we won't be able to see them. But then again, this is a film festival, so the idea is to see things we wouldn't see otherwise -- maybe this is a blessing in disguise...

Evening -- Maz and I fall asleep -- we just got back from New York 36hrs before flying to Nice, and jet lag is still munching away at us. Luckily, we wake up in time to make our premiere, and with plenty of time to get changed and ready, too. Maz looks really really good in her evening dress (hubba hubba), and I get to pop on my brand new tux -- and even though I forgot cufflinks, and don't know how to tie my bow tie, even I have to admit it doesn't look half bad. So far so good.

Part of the fun of a Cannes premiere is apparently to walk down a bit of the Croisette beforehand, to experience not only all the hubbub, but to have a souvenir picture taken -- even before you reach the red carpet, dozens of photographers jump at you, asking you to pose (and you should've seen Mary's face when one of them asked her to "turn around and give her a little Edie look over her shoulder"), and then handing you a receipt for you to come see the pictures the next day and decide if you want to buy one. Since our hotel is on the wrong side of the Festival, we take the hotel shuttle to the Hilton and walk from there. The shuttle ride is quite fun -- our driver, who was also our bellboy the previous day, for some reason snarls at us every time he says us (and then asks for a tip!), and drives like an utter madman; and Mary spends the whole of the trip helping me improvise a decent-looking bow tie knot for me. It works out well -- it ends up looking like a proper bow tie -- and we get to the Hilton with time to spare.

Then starts the walk. As promised, it's a bit crazy. Photographers literally throw themselves at you, yell at you, taunt you, maybe even insult you a bit if you won't stop for them -- and them being French, the fact that you're trying to make a screening time makes no difference -- stopping for them, in their eyes, should be your absolute priority, and you're a dastardly turd if you don't (despite the fact that, as Maz and I learned the next day, 19 out of 20 of their pictures were absolutely horrible). The other thing that's quite fun is the people hustling for tickets -- like in any other festival -- only here, because of the dress code, people have to be in tuxedos and evening dresses when they do it. Which means that, all the way down to the steps, you keep having 20- to 30-year olds in rented tuxes and night-of-my-life prom dresses pop up at you, asking if you've got an extra ticket, begging you to. It's an odd thing.

Anyway, the walk itself takes about 10 minutes, and then you're at the red carpet. You go through security (cops, barriers, ushers), and then you slide onto the red carpet, feet away of someone famous (if you're lucky -- in our case the most famous person on the carpet was French actress Helene de Fougerolles), and then take that 5 minute stroll down the carpet and up the steps. It's a bit of a kick, but it's not as mind-bending as many people say -- the photographers (also all in tuxedos and formal wear, which is awesome) don't care much about you, it's a quicker walk than people say, and as soon as you reach the steps you're just hurried up by a bunch of rude ushers and policemen (ah, French people...), so you can get in and stop clogging traffic (even if there's no traffic to speak of). The Palais des Festivals itself is a lovely building, all marble and glass and escalators, and once you reach the inside of the screening room, you're just shown to your cushy little red seat and you can wait for the movie by watching everyone walk in on the red carpet on the big screen. The last people to walk in on the red carpet are the director and cast of the night's film, who are then introduced to the audience, get a courtesy standing ovation even if though they haven't done anything worth applauding yet (and the Festival forces you to give a "standing" ovation -- the filmmaker and cast enter from the middle of the room, below the balconies, so that, wherever you're seated in the theater, you have to stand to see where they walk in from). And then the film begins...

"The Edge Of Heaven", dir. Fatih Akin -- Our first film was the world premiere of German-Turkish director Fatih Akin, whom I had never heard of before that day, but is apparently famous as one of Europe's most exciting young filmmakers. The film, divided in three segments ("Yeter's Death", "Lotte's Death", and "The Other Side"), tells the story of three families, one of them German, one of them Turkish, and one of them German-Turkish, and how their lives intersect when tragedy strikes each of them. The film takes place between Germany and Istanbul, and was apparently intended as a piece on East-West tensions, and on life, death, and forgiveness. It got solid and up reviews the next morning in the trades, and is supposed to be one of the 5 or 6 best films in the Official Competition this year...
...and we hated it. It's slow, it's dull, it's completely devoid of any human emotion other than stilted, cliched ones. The acting is absolutely dreadful across the board (exception made for Patricia Ziolkowska, who's actually quite good), and every single plot development can be predicted five minutes before it happens (doesn't help that the titles of each of the segments give away their endings, either). It's shot like an average student film -- terribly lit, to the point that some of it looks like DV rather than film. It's self-indulgent -- every single shot lasts 5 seconds too long, and you could cut a solid 45 minutes out of the film and not lose anything (on the contrary, it'd gain strength in the bargain). It's not a clever take on cultural clashes, or forgiveness, either -- you could call it intellectual, but not intelligent. In the end, all it comes up with is "it takes the loss of someone or something for us to realize that we need to get past our differences and just love each other". No fucking shit, dude. I'm glad you made a 120-minute snorefest to let us all know. All in all -- not a terrible film, but one heck of a massive disappointment.

"Intermission" -- between the end of the first film and the beginning of the second, at 10pm, you get about a half-hour for dinner and a bit of a rest, so what Maz and I did was find the first little beach vendor shack and buy a couple of sandwiches and Cokes, and we had a seat on one of the benches right by the beach and talked about how crap the film was (ah, good times...). On the way out, a couple of photographers still walk up to you and try and get you to pose for a couple pictures, but by this time in the evening it's easier to get them to leave you alone, as by now they seem pretty much bored with themselves too. Then it's 9.30, and it's time to go back in and enjoy a second film, in our case...

"The Man From London", dir. Bela Tarr --
The new film of Hungarian director Bela Tarr, The Man From London is apparently an adaptation from a George Simenon novella. I say "apparently", because of the 30mn of the film that we saw, nothing -- and I mean NOTHING -- happens.
The bad signs started when Bela Tarr (looking every inch the sleazy, self-involved European "artist") walked in to his ovation, and made a nice show of standing in front of his seat and going through an obviously prepared routine of a) looking surprised, b) looking ashamed, yet as if this is something that happens to him every time he walks into a cinema, a restaurant, or even his own bathroom, c) "begging" the audience to sit down. All of which while standing up and grinning like a Fat Cat. (Short aside -- am I the only one to hate the whole "begging people to sit down" thing? C'mon. If you really wanted them to sit down, give them a nod, a thank you gesture, another nod or salute-type thing, put your hand on your heart to show you're touched or something, and then just fucking sit down. )
The film itself is shot in gorgeous black-and-white. That's the one good thing you can say about it: The film itself is shot in gorgeous black-and-white. The first shot is nearly 15 minutes long. Why? No reason -- it's just a static camera that pans left and right to cover the "action". Only there's no action to speak of. The second shot lasts an extra 7 minutes. All in all, that's nearly 25 minutes of film gone by, and this is the action that happens in those 25 minutes: a man on a boat is given a briefcase and leaves the boat. The man who gave him the briefcase also leaves the boat. Two men fight on the docks and one of them is pushed into the water, never to resurface. The other man walks into a hotel. That's it. 25 minutes, two shots, and that's ALL that happens (never mind the fact that the shots seem like two long shots, but pan over black every few seconds, so they could've been just intercut takes, completely negating any technical mastery you could try and see in them).
Halfway through all of this, people in the audience started uncomfortably laughing. So little was happening on screen that the balcony started erupting with applause every time something (a guy opening a door, for instance -- literally) did happen. And then people slowly started walking out. One by one, then two by two, then dozen by dozen. We found ourselves in the middle of three near-empty rows, Mary having fallen asleep (for ten minutes -- and when she woke up she had missed, oh, well, nothing), and eventually walked out too. We met dozens of people in the lobby, plenty of them shaking their heads, some of them almost ashamed by the damn thing. We overheard people saying things such as "I don't know -- some people might like it, but if you ask me, it's a piece of shit", and if anyone overheard us, they would've heard something along the same lines, only even more flowery.
Turns out we weren't the only ones. Half the audience walked out, and the next morning reviews were glowing -- the Hollywood Reporter called the film "unwatchable", saying that any of his merits lived "only in the director's mind". Metro's review was replaced by an apology by the reviewer, explaining that he fell asleep in the middle of the first shot. Bloomberg.com says the film feels like "a self-parody", called it "less than convincing" and "laborious". The best review came from Time Out -- who managed to find the film a positive experience thanks to its "sound design" and "metaphysical poetry". *insert snoring sounds here*

After walking out, Maz and I spent twenty minutes or so by the Cinema de la Plage, the big screen on the beach showing free movies every evening, and watched the end of "All That Jazz". We then called Richard, who was supposed to pick us up in his car to drive us to Cap d'Antibes for the night's party, and let him know that we were out early, so that he wouldn't have to wait until 1 in the morning to pick us up. We met him in the Hilton, got in the car, and headed to the last part of our first evening in Cannes...

The Quintessentially Party at the Eden Roc -- The Eden Roc Hotel du Cap, in Cap d'Antibes, is -- to put it simply -- the most exclusive hotel in France. It looks like a great big Riviera mansion, overlooking the Mediterranean, and you get to it by driving through the town of Cap d'Antibes, through big iron gates, and up a winding drive through beautifully lit pine trees. The hotel has an outdoor pool right looking right over the ocean, a private beach, a private jetty, private everythings.

When we got there, it was about 12.30 in the morning, and the place was locked down with bouncers and security -- people checking invitations, keeping non-invited people out, the whole nine yards. You drive up to the hotel entrance, and your car is taken away from you by one of a half-dozen valets in white jackets. Another blonde in her 20s hectically checks your name off on the list -- my first time having my name on a list! -- and shows you downstairs to where the party is taking place, on this half-indoor half-outdoor terrace overlooking the pool and the sea, lit with discreet little spotlights and the occasional flaming torch (a couple of which I almost tripped while wandering around).

Now as I might've mentioned, the main purpose of the party was to serve as an after-party to the amFar AIDS fundraising dinner at the Moulin des Mougins restaurant earlier that evening, where rich people paid $1,000 a head to have dinner with Sharon Stone and other famous buddies, and also participated in an auction. So, for instance, people paid up about $200,000 for Kylie Minogue to perform two songs for them; a woman paid $350,000 for a kiss with George Clooney; and people in general paid to watch Dita Von Teese strip on a giant stick of lipstick (true, and oh so Freudian, story). After the event (which raised nearly $7 million total, so well done everyone involved), people were invited to come to the Eden Roc, where Quintessentially (a "lifestyle assistance" company -- ie, a club you pay to be a member of, and who sponsors parties, opera shows, luxury travel, and other luxury things you can exclusively take part in) and a cosmetics company hosted an open bar party for people to unwind at.

It was a fun Hollywood crowd -- in the sense that 9 out of 10 people there had no talent, but plenty of money -- and most of our evening was spent by the bar, having a few drinks, and people-watching. People-watching that involved both watching the "regular" people, studying their behavior, their dress, the facades they put up to prove that they belong -- but mostly involved watching the famous people who walked in just inches away from us, and judgmentally decide how good (or bad), and nice (or grumpy) we thought they looked.

The first one to walk in, at about 1 in the morning, was Victoria Silvstedt. Now, for those of you who don't know her, Victoria Silvstedt used to compete as an Olympic skier for the Swedish ski team, won Miss Sweden, became a model for Chanel, Christian Dior and Armani, and reached worldwide fame by appearing nude in Playboy, becoming a Playmate Of The Year, making softcore Playboy movies, and so on so forth. Since then he's done the usual Swedish-fantasy-girl post-Playboy stuff (hosting Eurotrash in the UK, posing for FHM, being a spokesperson for Guess jeans), but every guy in the world between 15 and 35 will know her as a Playmate. (Proof: All the information in this paragraph I stole from her Wikipedia page. Except the Playboy stuff, which I already knew. *clears throat*).

So she's the first to walk in. Following her, in little 10 to 15 minute intervals, were:

-- Harvey Weinstein and girlfriend Georgina Chapman. As expected, Harvey looks like a big, slow ape (hint: if they ever make another live action Tarzan, Harvey should play the grumpy ape who adopts little Tarzan), and you can tell from the first time you lay eyes on him that he's not a nice dude. He spent most of the party walking around, schmoozing and chatting, mostly with people who came to him (a sign of power, I guess), making sure trophy girlfriend Georgina Chapman stayed right by him all the way.
-- Brett Ratner and his date, Random Airhead Model #7. Ratner's famous for one-night-standing with anything he lays eyes on that has boobies (good thing he kept clear from Harvey Weinstein, then), and he walked in acting like a smug, arrogant, spoilt brat (behavior he'd have every other time we saw him round Cannes, too). Ratner (who directed the Rush Hour films, the dreadful Red Dragon, and X-Men 3, also known as the worst super-hero film Joel Schumacher had nothing to do with) essentially acted like he should be Weinstein's offspring -- moves like an ape, with no subtlety or grace whatsoever, and acts with such arrogance, such I-own-you-all-ness, that you just can NOT help being put-off by him. But it's also tainted with such obvious insecurity -- like a middle-class suburban kid who's not only used to getting everything he wants, but knows he should bully people into giving it to him, because if he waits for them to give it to him based on his merits alone, he probably ain't gonna get it. But anyway -- he walked in, wandered around for 25-30 minutes, and then walked out with his blonde.
-- Then came Rosario Dawson, Zoe Bell and Tracie Thoms (also known as the girls from QT's Death Proof), who seemed quite sweet, and basically just stuck together by the bar, had a drink or two, and chatted like good mates before disappearing. Rosario Dawson also happens to look absolutely gorgeous -- for anyone who never happened to notice it on screen, trust me, it's there.
-- After them came Scott Caan, Jimmy's kid, of Ocean's Eleven/Twelve/Thirteen fame. Amazingly short, and dressed and moussed up like an extra in Saturday Night Fever, he did actually seem like a fun guy -- but only stayed a few minutes.
-- Then came burlesque queen Dita Von Teese. I only caught a couple of glimpses of her, but she looks as white as you'd imagine -- like a little porcelain statue. I don't know if she's deliberately aware of what it means, but I think it's (other than the fact that she's beautiful and, probably, a great show woman) one of the reasons she's as famous as she is. She looks utterly unique, and beyond that, it's a look that has none of the vulgarity, of the commonness, of your average burlesque stripper, all blonde locks and big tits and glittery thongs. She looks...well...period. I think that that, the name (Dita Von Teese -- bloddy genius)...the woman's got a great sense of what sells. And it's interesting because, is that a good thing? If she's got such intelligence, such a sense of showmanship and salesmanship, could it be put to better uses than burlesque? But what better use is there than burlesque (he he)? And how come all the women who seem to be really intelligent, really cunning, not only happen to be stunning, but know that that's their number one currency, and they manage to see it as such, while still putting what seems like healthy boundaries on it being seen as the only thing they have? Obviously, that means that our society is a society where men are only comfortable with strong women whose currency is their sexuality (it allows us to believe that they don't have any other assets), or who, like those boardroom women in suits and short hair, are so devoid of sexuality that we can feel comfortable with the idea that they have no sexuality to use against us. But then is it a good thing for women to play along with that? Part of me feels it's the best thing -- sexuality is like anything else, intelligence, charisma, beauty...no one's asking you to sleep with people, but if you can use it as an asset, then you should, and maybe people will only be comfortable with it when people do. Or maybe not, maybe it debases something. Does that make any sense? Probably not. Just rambling. Bottom line is: she seems like a damn clever woman, and I'd love to sit at a dinner or a table or something where she would speak, and discuss, and where a conversation could be had, get into that head, see if she's got an awareness of all these things.
-- Then came Claudia Schiffer. Looked gorgeous, even though she definitely is starting to look her age (37). Actually she looks a little older than her age, because of all the effort she seems to be putting into looking younger. But she was smiling, and graceful, and even though she didn't stay long, she got her pictures taken by the press right in front of us, giving Maz and I a fun little couple of minutes discussing how fun it'd be to unzip her dress and pull it down right there and then. As you obviously did not hear in the news, we decided against it.
-- Last came Kerry Washington (of Ray and The Last King Of Scotland fame), who seemed lovely, but barely had she walked in that she stepped on her dress and tripped right over one of the picture lights and tumbled right...onto...Mary. No one got hurt, but it got Maz feeling worried that people thought for some reason she might've engineered it. He he.

And that was all our famous people. Sharon Stone never really showed -- despite Richard desperately getting ETAs for her arrival every five minutes, checking in with photographers, asking the hosts -- and neither did Woody Allen, who had apparently been invited, and whom I would've loved to have seen. In any case, it was a really fun night -- famous people, lots of people-watching, a good bar...

And that was the end of the night. We popped home, collapsed to sleep, and looked forward to the next day...